For all its useful how-to topics, reviews, interviews, music, movies and science documentaries, YouTube fails to enforce its own community guidelines on vile acts and gratuitous death. Nowhere is this more true than “hunting” videos or clips of pet dogs killing various species. Under the vague banner of survival skills or cultural education, YouTube has become an outlet for rural depravity and wildlife serial killers. Positive comments on these videos, like “nice shot!” or “the dogs got him!” reflect the crassness of the material. A typical I.Q.-85 response to negative comments is “if you don’t like it, don’t watch it.” The number of animals succumbing to gunfire far exceeds human-on-human mass shootings, including all wars combined.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=kill+shot+compilation or https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dog+fights+raccoon
It’s clear that some animals are shot to death solely for making videos, and there’s an apparent rise in voyeuristic hunting licenses just for this purpose. They see other trashy trophy hunters killing for ego and want to add their own corpse piles. Some of these neo-hunters do emphasize ethics, but spread the false impression that wildlife could sustain large populations the “natural” way. They can’t see that urban residents would starve without dense livestock (and planted fields vs. gathering).
There should be a separate site called SnuffTube for this so-called “recreational” or “educational” content. Trophy and “sport” hunting videos are often filled with slow-motion replays of bullet-strikes, mountain folk testing rifles at cruelly inaccurate distances, or pit bulls shaking rodents to death. Reckless gun-play videos merge into this category, showing yahoos out in the woods or desert “shootin’ stuff and blowin’ stuff up.” They tend to be the very people who ought not own firearms!
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=gun+bullet+test or https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=50+caliber+vs
Most gun-play involves wasted target objects, like seeing how many pieces of X caliber Y can penetrate. There’s also a Pranks genre that wastes large volumes of resources, like covering mansions in toilet paper, filling swimming pools with bath bombs, or wasting oil with car stunts and emissions modifications. Vlogging families that record vapid daily routines merge with the prank category, since they tend to gin-up the action. Those videos could be moved to a site called GluttonTube. Many video-creators seem to be fairly wealthy from YouTube revenues and magnify environmental problems caused by disposable income. The whole scene feeds on itself.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=pool+prank+gallons or https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=pranks+gone+wrong
Borderline pornographic content is another common subject, though less technically offensive than weapons-related videos. Countless “yoga” sessions, best named as “hot yoga,” fall into the near-porn category. Women preen and show off under the ruse that it’s not entirely about sex. On or off YouTube, the “fitness model” craze rides on titillation and there’s no end to glossy asses and bathroom selfies. Too much easy exposure to sexual signals must be warping kids. Gone are the days of finding dad’s magazine stash.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=hot+yoga+ass (it’s all about heath, eh?)
Despite all that, YouTube censors often find free speech more offensive than visually mature or evil content. For example, if you note that POC have a big crime problem but groups like Black Lives Matter try to blame their moral failings on police, the woke brigade may ban you for simply observing the world. This is a systemic problem on other social media sites, of course.
In a best case scenario, YouTube may slyly be allowing trashy videos to showcase the depravity of human nature in the hope that activists will control it, but that seems unlikely. It’s gone on far too long.
One solution could be YouTube eventually running out of server space (typically denied, like most limits on this planet) and being forced to delete millions of hours of junk footage. They could start today with anything that showcases death as entertainment.
This page may be updated and reworded at random with new information. If you cite it, please post the link instead of a pasted snapshot.
Yeah big-tech is completely done for mature, adult conversation. Double standards run amok. They’ll censor you for pointing IQ differences between races and genders, but not for posting a full episode of a dating show where people come on stage naked and select each other based on size and shape of body and body parts. No kidding…
Naked Attraction S04E01 Best Romantic And Erotic Adult Movies T.v shows T.v Series 2021 #7
I have no words. I cannot believe what our world is coming to when stuff like this, and attitudes in it, are being normalized. It makes me cringe hard enough to yearn for the 1800’s.
We now have alternative platforms like Rumble, Odysee, Bitchute and the like, but even they’ve started banning people for “hate speech.”
I believe it’s all part of an agenda of ideological subversion. They don’t want people thinking seriously about serious matters. They want people distracted by nonsense. They want people to be shorn of their moral standards and sense of purpose (hence the constant immersion in distractions and videos which showcase degradation) so that they become malleable putty in the hands of the ruling elite.
Sorry about the video frame showing up. I didn’t intend that when I pasted the link. Edit my comment and put the URL in code tags or something so that WordPress doesn’t render it as an embedded video.
That video was blocked here due to “LDS” content, but I can guess that it was similar to Vimeo 331657992. The proper Brits seem fine with banality, including the Daily Mail’s galleries of famous tarts. There’s also a big mixed message over normal reactions to female exhibitionism, taken out of context.